I saw the serial on Sherlock Holmes and I thought about how they were
speculating that he might be 'gay,' (eventhough he is a fictional
character). I thought of other known single men in the history, and all
those unknown masculine gendered males, who avoided getting married and
led a lonely life, just because they did not want women in their life,
and there was no social space for men to say they would like to live
with a man.
However, the moment you classify them under the western concept of
'homosexual' with its entire third gender background, suddenly these
masculine gendered males appear to be effeminate, or at least, not manly
enough, with something lacking in their manhood, as is to be expected
with the third genders. And, to think that these men guarded their
attraction for men with such secrecy, sometimes, forgoing their sexual
needs altogether only so to avoid being classified with the third
genders.
Its such a misrepresentation of these men, to call them 'gay,' and
unfair to them. But, if they could do it to one of the most manly guys
in the world, Alexander the great and his lover Hephaistion (ref. the
movie "Alexander the Great"), who conquered this world, the ordinary men
don't stand a chance.
-------------------------------------------------
Also funny about these explanations by modern-day queered westerners
is that in those times, men hardly had girlfriends, although, most got
married, ... but marriage was not at all about sexuality in those days,
but a social/ religious duty or a manhood role for men, AND, you could
not be married for a number of reasons (of course, its besides the point
that every masculine gendered male has an interest in men).
Men in those days were not forced to be publicly intimate with women
to prove their manhood, like in modern day west, and so, men were hardly
publicly intimate with women. AND, it was the most 'normal' thing to do
for two men to share a bed, so to arrive at any decision on Sherlock's
sexual preferences using the modern day unnatural western lifestyle as
the criteria, is plain and simply absurd.
Once again, homosexuality is an invalid, queer, western concept.
The concept of Homosexual and Homosexuality is simply invalid.
No comments:
Post a Comment