Never
in the history of mankind has the world witnessed such enmasse male
heterosexuality, as in the west. The west likes to sell this
heterosexuality as 'natural,' biological and also seeks to distort the
history of mankind in order to show them as heterosexual as well,
however, the truth is that all that heterosexuality seen in the west is
artificially/ unnaturally generated, and can be termed as 'induced
heterosexuality.'
As Biologist Bruce Bagemihl claims in his unprecedented book "Biological exuberance," the kind of heterosexuality we witness in the west is not found in the natural world. In his study he concludes that this heterosexuality doesn't form more than 5% of animal sexuality.
Indeed, even if we look practically, heterosexuality cannot be all that pervasive and constant, year long thing. Because of the single reason that it is inherently tied with reproduction. And, so, you MAYNOT take it casually or for romantic bonding purposes, the way it is glorified in the west. The purpose of male-female sex is strictly and limited to reproduction, and it may not cross that line under natural conditions. Under natural conditions, sex and romantic bonds between males is the norm for non-procreative purposes. It is not for nothing that it is sexuality for another man which is an uniform trait of males, especially, mammalian males, rather than sexuality for females. The purview, extent and depth of male sexuality for females is extremely limited in nature.
Let's see what are those artificial/ unnatural factors that make 'heterosexuality' possible.
1. Breaking men from men: The first and foremost is the suppression of man's capability to desire men. Unless, men are broken sexually and romantically from other men, men will not divert their sexual energies into heterosexuality. And, indeed this is the reason why most human societies have come to be so hostile to desire between men -- in fact, modern west looks down upon any kind of intimacy between males -- even friendships.
2. Forcing men with women: No amount of breaking men from men can force men with women, unless some other crucial mechanism is used. And, that is why the societies have employed the route of "social manhood," the singlemost important factor in a man's life to force men with women. It has always been achieved by making sex with women the basic requirement to clear the 'manhood test,' that all societies have required their males to go through, in order to become a 'man,' socially. And, failure to prove one's 'capability' to penetrate women results in a punishment for men worse than death -- to be labelled/ categorized as a 'third gender,' or a 'non-man' (gay in modern west).
3. Other mechanisms: The other mechanisms have been employed by societies since the ancient times, although, the scope of their control on men was limited in those days. Things however got immense boost in the modern west, and science has developed several tools to achieve the above two crucial (for the society's pov) goals.
Science has also helped in removing the most important physical barrier in making 'heterosexuality' 'practical' at a vast scale. And, this has been through the invention of birth control measures, that ensure that male-female sex can be ridden of reproduction, so as to enjoy it in the same manner as male-male sex (at least, on paper -- in reality, male-female sex can not equate male-male sex in terms of pleasure, although, its a 'forbidden fruit.'). This mechanism is both ironical and unfair, because, 'heterosexuality' has received the power it has today, only because of the fact that it results in reproduction, that societies have struggled and competed for in all these ages.
If sex has to be broken from reproduction, then the entire exercise of breaking men from men and forcing them with women looses its logic.
And this is what the world needs to understand, particularly the men -- because, the effeminates (third genders, heterosexuals, gays) and the sexually promiscuous women tend to benefit from the oppression of men this causes. They have all the interest in perpetuating this oppression, and they will always seek to oppose any attempt to liberate the men. It's the men (straight men, if you please) and only the men who can liberate themselves.
As Biologist Bruce Bagemihl claims in his unprecedented book "Biological exuberance," the kind of heterosexuality we witness in the west is not found in the natural world. In his study he concludes that this heterosexuality doesn't form more than 5% of animal sexuality.
Indeed, even if we look practically, heterosexuality cannot be all that pervasive and constant, year long thing. Because of the single reason that it is inherently tied with reproduction. And, so, you MAYNOT take it casually or for romantic bonding purposes, the way it is glorified in the west. The purpose of male-female sex is strictly and limited to reproduction, and it may not cross that line under natural conditions. Under natural conditions, sex and romantic bonds between males is the norm for non-procreative purposes. It is not for nothing that it is sexuality for another man which is an uniform trait of males, especially, mammalian males, rather than sexuality for females. The purview, extent and depth of male sexuality for females is extremely limited in nature.
Let's see what are those artificial/ unnatural factors that make 'heterosexuality' possible.
1. Breaking men from men: The first and foremost is the suppression of man's capability to desire men. Unless, men are broken sexually and romantically from other men, men will not divert their sexual energies into heterosexuality. And, indeed this is the reason why most human societies have come to be so hostile to desire between men -- in fact, modern west looks down upon any kind of intimacy between males -- even friendships.
2. Forcing men with women: No amount of breaking men from men can force men with women, unless some other crucial mechanism is used. And, that is why the societies have employed the route of "social manhood," the singlemost important factor in a man's life to force men with women. It has always been achieved by making sex with women the basic requirement to clear the 'manhood test,' that all societies have required their males to go through, in order to become a 'man,' socially. And, failure to prove one's 'capability' to penetrate women results in a punishment for men worse than death -- to be labelled/ categorized as a 'third gender,' or a 'non-man' (gay in modern west).
3. Other mechanisms: The other mechanisms have been employed by societies since the ancient times, although, the scope of their control on men was limited in those days. Things however got immense boost in the modern west, and science has developed several tools to achieve the above two crucial (for the society's pov) goals.
Science has also helped in removing the most important physical barrier in making 'heterosexuality' 'practical' at a vast scale. And, this has been through the invention of birth control measures, that ensure that male-female sex can be ridden of reproduction, so as to enjoy it in the same manner as male-male sex (at least, on paper -- in reality, male-female sex can not equate male-male sex in terms of pleasure, although, its a 'forbidden fruit.'). This mechanism is both ironical and unfair, because, 'heterosexuality' has received the power it has today, only because of the fact that it results in reproduction, that societies have struggled and competed for in all these ages.
If sex has to be broken from reproduction, then the entire exercise of breaking men from men and forcing them with women looses its logic.
And this is what the world needs to understand, particularly the men -- because, the effeminates (third genders, heterosexuals, gays) and the sexually promiscuous women tend to benefit from the oppression of men this causes. They have all the interest in perpetuating this oppression, and they will always seek to oppose any attempt to liberate the men. It's the men (straight men, if you please) and only the men who can liberate themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment